Well, ladies and gentlemen, my big battle against Mitt Romney and his Gang is about to begin. It will be an eventful process - for sure. As reported by 'War on Error' in his D yesterday titled; "Romney Sued for RICO in Fed Court: eToys Deal".
At issue is the fact that Goldman Sachs and Bain Capital have conspired together in what I'm alleging is an unlawful manner. It started back in 1999 with The Learning Company, then Stage Stores in 2000, Kay Bee in 2000 and eToys in 1999; and federal estate scams by what is known as a "Bankruptcy Ring" of organized attorneys stealing from federal estates.
In 1999 eToys went public to $85 per share; but the entity eToys.com only received less than $20. This is a classic 'pump-n-dump' initial public offering ("I.P.O.") scheme; and it was more recently reported upon by the New York Times OpEd via Joe Nocera in his article titled; "
Rigging the I.P.O. Game". But one can NOT sue for Racketeering on securities fraud until a party has been found guilty of that beforehand. That being said, we only need 2 felony violations, within 10 years, to succeed in a Civil Racketeering lawsuit; and Matt Taibbi has documented those for us already, in his September 2012 Rolling Stone cover story "
Greed and Debt: The True Story About Mitt Romney and Bain Capital".
Each of those well publicized articles by the NY Times on Goldman Sachs eToys I.P.O. frauds and Matt Taibbi on Stage Stores federal corruption funding and Kay Bee Toys Michael Glazer $100 million bribery scheme, are details of separate, specific, bad faith acts noteworthy. What yours truly is able to do, is to tie them both together and clearly show how it is Perjury, Fraud and Racketeering.
More below the squiggly...
Thus far, the RICO Gang is Getting away 'Scot Free'
.
Many articles touch upon our eToys saga that has been going on for more than a decade now. When we first compelled the bad guys (attorneys who sold out their clients) to confess they lied under oath, it was reported in the Wall Street Journal on July 25, 2005. That article is titled; "
eToys investors claim conflict at law firm".
One law firm (MNAT) admitted lying under oath about its relationship to Goldman Sachs. The other firm (Traub Bonacquist & Fox) confessed it lied under oath about Barry Gold; whom both MNAT and Traub conspired to put inside as a post-bankruptcy petition President/CEO of eToys. But TBF is the attorney for Creditors and Barry Gold (Traub's secret partner) is the Debtor. It is against the law for Debtor and Creditors to be one and the same.
Fellow Kossack "Cordgrass" wrote a Diary on how to bring down Goldman Sachs (here). Add that to the United States Trustee Motion to Disgorge Traub's firm for $1.6 million (here), plus the NY Times article and Matt Taibbi's "Greed and Debt" story; then you have many combined pieces of the puzzle.
Goldman Sachs and Bain Attorney was the U.S. Attorney
.
Now, if you have confessions to lying under oath and the United States Trustee (the Police of the Bankruptcy system) testifying that the parties were "forewarned" not to do the crimes that they went ahead and did in secret;
Then Why isn't there any arrests?
Real simple equation there. Goldman Sachs and Bain Capital have a common law firm of Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnel ("MNAT"). That law firm has confessed lying about Goldman Sachs; but has never admitted that the firm is also lying and concealing the fact that it represents Bain Capital.
This is because Bain bought eToys and MNAT reduced prices (Bankruptcy Fraud).
Furthermore, these crimes transpired when Romney was CEO of Bain Capital and he lied to the entire country about his tenure as Bain Capital, in order to dodge the fact that Bain Capital has benefited from fraud. Romney has boasted how he gets millions each year from Bain Capital.
Thus, if Bain benefited from fraud, then Romney benefited from fraud.
But the real biggie is the fact that Mitt Romney now claims to be "retroactively" retired from Bain Capital as CEO as of August 2001 - back to February 11, 1999. Another item of note of that same period of time is that Colm Connolly was a partner of MNAT from 1999 to August 2, 2001. That fact CAN'T be disputed; because it is now permanently archived on the Dept. of Justice Office of Legal Policy website (
here).
Then, Bain's law firm partner Connolly became the United States Attorney!
For his entire seven (7) years in office in Wilmington, Delaware, Colm Connolly refused to investigate and/or prosecute his former partners and their clients. This is against the law, against ethics, against DOJ protocols and violates all common sense on the issues of Conflicts of Interest.
Capone can't arrange Nitti to be prosecutor and get off "Scot Free"!
QUESTION THAT REMAINS
.
There's no doubt that MNAT and
Traub lied; because they have confessed. There's also NO reasonable doubt that MNAT is connected to both Goldman Sachs and Bain Capital. MNAT admitted Goldman Sachs. And, in the issue that Matt Taibbi talks about Kay Bee CEO Michael Glazer paying himself $18 million and Bain $83 million.
MNAT is defending Bain and Traub sought to be the Prosecutor of Glazer/Bain.
So, I ask you, are Goldman Sachs and Bain Capital so much above the Law, especially since they are connected to Mitt Romney in this case? Where they actually were powerful enough to arrange for one of their own to become the Delaware United States Attorney who was corrupt enough to bury the investigation and protect them from prosecution;
Where Mitt Romney is now Permanently Above the Law?
Is Mitt Romney Too Big to Fail & Too Corrupting to Jail?